Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
When a prompt simultaneously requires mutually conflicting formats such as natural language expression and structured scoring, the quality of both types of output usually declines.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWriting scoring rules into a prompt in natural language has drawbacks: wording variations across different calls may cause the model's understanding to drift, and the scoring logic cannot be directly parsed or reused by programs.80% similarUnverifiedWhen the generator and extractor are different models, the two parties' encoding conventions for natural language are not necessarily consistent, which may amplify communication loss.77% similarUnverifiedThe output of large language models inherently appears plausible (fluency bias), meaning that even when the reasoning chain is wrong, the generated natural language remains grammatically correct and natural in tone, rendering traditional monitoring approaches based on output format or exception capture ineffective.75% similarUnverifiedWhen multiple large language models strongly disagree in their annotations of the same document, it often indicates that the codebook rules at that point are ambiguous, equivocal, or insufficiently covered.75% similarUnverified系统提示词的语言选择会影响输出风格，当系统提示词语言与用户输入语言不一致时会产生行为叠加效应74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1015197API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1015197MCP
get_claim(id=1015197)