Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
When letting the model send email on its own, any summary deviation or misjudged tone goes straight into the customer's inbox and is hard to retract afterwards; the safer approach is to have the assistant always leave the prepared reply in draft state, with a human deciding whether to adopt and send it.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn this workflow, each email draft is reviewed by the person before deciding whether to send it, rather than being sent automatically in bulk.79% similarUnverifiedIn email processing scenarios, auto-send should never be enabled and draft mode should always be maintained, to avoid AI hallucinations generating incorrect quotes that are automatically sent to potential clients.75% similarUnverifiedIn a typical Agent design, letting an LLM autonomously decide when to invoke the sendEmail and issueRefund tools leads to misreading sarcastic tone, following malicious instructions in emails, or issuing duplicate refunds for the same order.73% similarUnverifiedWhen an email draft is declined, the workflow triggers a Revision Agent, where the operator can give revision instructions in natural language and the AI adjusts the email content accordingly.72% similarUnverifiedFor sensitive content involving foreign-facing email replies, compensation calculations, and contract modifications, AI is only responsible for generating the content and cannot perform 100% review and confirmation; a second manual review by a salesperson or legal counsel is still required.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1016496API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1016496MCP
get_claim(id=1016496)