Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Favur's reading is that the stall counter is mainly catching thoroughness—these Agents already have what the step needs, it's just that nobody told them 'enough.' The count cannot prove that the notification caused the completion, because some Agents (article truncated at the end).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/27/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen an Agent determines that tools are no longer needed, it is essentially judging that the existing information is sufficient to complete the task; if the output at this point is unsatisfactory, it can be resolved by switching to a more capable model.66% similarUnverifiedIf the approval threshold is too loose, control is lost; if too strict, the benefits of automation are lost — the true balance is letting the Agent handle the vast majority of processes while inserting lightweight human confirmation only at critical decision nodes.64% similarUnverifiedUsage-based billing is only justifiable when the agent can reliably complete tasks; if users are charged for failures, they will feel they are paying for the vendor's technical immaturity.63% similarUnverifiedLetta leaves the memory write decision to the Agent itself; its reflection prompt includes an already-captured check: if the memory or skill already sufficiently contains this information, skip it, which is an instruction to the model rather than a threshold in code.63% similarUnverifiedThe core of a truly capable Agent is not that it never makes mistakes, but that it has a built-in error-correction loop of execute–verify–reflect–correct–remember.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1018332API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1018332MCP
get_claim(id=1018332)