Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
What actually beat competitors in the benchmarks is Wonder Full; most of the impressive results come from the Full version, not the Wonder version available via API.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/11/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn MemoryBench, Wonder defeated Fable, Opus, and Astra; on the Artificial Analysis index, Wonder Full ranks second, behind only Opus 5.5.72% similarUnverifiedAmong the 14 benchmarks Meta itself published, Muse Wonder won 5, mainly in long-horizon coding, legal agent tasks, and Meta's internal memory tests; it lost 9, including ProgramBench (Opus leads 70.5 to 50.0).70% similarUnverifiedOn the Harvey LAB-AA legal benchmark, Muse Wonder scored 10.0 and Claude Opus 5.5 scored 4.2, doubling Wonder's score, but the highest score in the whole row is only Wonder Full's 13.1.67% similarUnverifiedAmong the 14 benchmarks listed on Meta's model card, Muse Wonder (the API version) achieved 5 wins and 9 losses against Claude Opus 5.5.66% similarUnverifiedIn the creator's self-made code audit benchmark, the Full version performed close to Astra and Fable, while the base version Muse Wonder scored almost only half of the Full version, a gap of more than 30%.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1019567API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1019567MCP
get_claim(id=1019567)