Muse Wonder Full
An AI model released by Meta Superintelligence Labs and part of the Muse series. It is a more complete version of Muse Wonder, offering greater capability or a larger parameter scale.
Core Facts
Muse Wonder is offered through the Meta Model API and Muse Code; Muse Wonder Full is for Muse Code subscribers.
Muse Wonder's API pricing is $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, offered through Meta's coding service platform.
Meta launched two new AI models: Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full.
Timeline (last 90 days)
Knowledge is a weak spot for Muse Wonder Full, whose AA-Omniscience score is lower than that of Claude Opus 5.5.
Muse Wonder Full scored 30 on the AA-Omniscience factual recall test.
Setting Wonder's reasoning effort to max does not make it become Full.
Claude Opus 5.5 is the absolute flagship of Anthropic's product line, while Muse Wonder is positioned as the smaller of Meta's two models, with its larger version being Muse Wonder Full (available only via Muse Code).
In coding agent scenarios, Claude Code on Opus 5.5 scored 66, Wonder scored 63, and only Wonder Full can reach 68.
Muse Wonder Full scored 56 on the Artificial Analysis v4.3 leaderboard, second globally, behind Claude Opus 5.5's 58; the standard version of Muse Wonder scored 52.
Some users reported that a single Wonder Full run consumed 38% of the weekly Muse Code quota, indicating that long-duration agent tasks are extremely compute-intensive.
Meta announced the same day that its larger Muse Wonder Full model is available only to Muse Code subscribers and is not offered via API.
In the Deep Sweep benchmark test, Gemini 4 Argon scored 77.9%, second only to Muse Wonder Full's 79%, ranking second.
Wonder Full trails Opus 5.5 on ProgramBench (59.0 vs 70.5), Terminal-Bench 4.0, and HealthBench Pro.
36 more timeline events
All Facts (20)
Muse Wonder is offered through the Meta Model API and Muse Code; Muse Wonder Full is for Muse Code subscribers.
80%VerifiedMuse Wonder's API pricing is $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, offered through Meta's coding service platform.
80%VerifiedMeta launched two new AI models: Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full.
75%Partially VerifiedIn coding agent scenarios, Claude Code on Opus 5.5 scored 66, Wonder scored 63, and only Wonder Full can reach 68.
70%Partially VerifiedIn the Intelligence Index given by the independent evaluation organization Artificial Analysis, Muse Wonder scores only 52, while Claude Opus 5.5 reaches 58.
70%Partially VerifiedIn the DeepSWE 1.1 benchmark, Muse Wonder Full achieved 79.0%, exceeding Claude Opus 5.5's 74.2% and GPT-6 Astra's 74.1%.
65%Partially VerifiedMeta's chart shows Muse Wonder beating Claude Opus 5.5 on long-horizon coding tasks: DeepSWE score 78.8 versus 74.2, SWE-Marathon score 53.1 versus 46.3.
65%Partially VerifiedMuse Code is subscription-based, with the Power Usage plan at $50 per month including Muse Wonder Full, and the product page lists macOS and Windows support.
65%Partially VerifiedMeta's superintelligence lab released two brand-new models on Monday—Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full.
75%UnverifiedClaude Opus 5.5 is the absolute flagship of Anthropic's product line, while Muse Wonder is positioned as the smaller of Meta's two models, with its larger version being Muse Wonder Full (available only via Muse Code).
60%UnverifiedMuse Wonder Full scored 56 on the Artificial Analysis v4.3 leaderboard, second globally, behind Claude Opus 5.5's 58; the standard version of Muse Wonder scored 52.
60%UnverifiedMeta describes two model features: Active Memory carries relevant context across conversations, and Active Focus keeps trying different paths on difficult goals and confirms before critical actions.
60%Partially VerifiedMeta officially released the MuseWonder series of models, including the standard MuseWonder and the more powerful MuseWonder Full.
65%UnverifiedMuse Wonder Full scored 30 on the AA-Omniscience factual recall test.
50%UnverifiedKnowledge is a weak spot for Muse Wonder Full, whose AA-Omniscience score is lower than that of Claude Opus 5.5.
50%UnverifiedSetting Wonder's reasoning effort to max does not make it become Full.
50%UnverifiedSome users reported that a single Wonder Full run consumed 38% of the weekly Muse Code quota, indicating that long-duration agent tasks are extremely compute-intensive.
50%UnverifiedIn the Deep Sweep benchmark test, Gemini 4 Argon scored 77.9%, second only to Muse Wonder Full's 79%, ranking second.
50%UnverifiedWonder Full trails Opus 5.5 on ProgramBench (59.0 vs 70.5), Terminal-Bench 4.0, and HealthBench Pro.
50%UnverifiedIn the OSWorld V2.1 benchmark, Muse Wonder Full achieved 78.4%, falling short of Claude Opus 5.5's 81.8%, and Anthropic still has a marginal advantage in desktop environment control.
50%