Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
On non-degenerate classes, every consistent learner (no matter how it breaks ties) achieves the optimal realizable sample complexity, with the gap only within a constant factor.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedHigh-dimensional structure learning of Gaussian DAGs faces a statistical-computational gap: methods with sharp sample complexity rely on computationally expensive subset searches and require a pre-specified in-degree upper bound, while polynomial-time algorithms exhibit comparatively inferior sample complexity.75% similarUnverified应从最简单的单Agent方案出发，只在数据证明拆分确有收益时才引入复杂度73% similarUnverifiedIn the agnostic learning setting, the gap between the sample complexity of every ERM and the known lower bound is at most the ratio of the DS dimension to the Natarajan dimension multiplied by a constant.72% similarUnverifiedSparse attention reduces computational complexity to near-linear by having each token attend only to a subset of the sequence.71% similarUnverifiedWhen individually tuning dedicated learning rates for each control group and repeating experiments with three random seeds, the advantage of repairing only the encoder disappears, reaching parity with the other approaches.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1023003API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1023003MCP
get_claim(id=1023003)