Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the agnostic learning setting, the gap between the sample complexity of every ERM and the known lower bound is at most the ratio of the DS dimension to the Natarajan dimension multiplied by a constant.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn non-degenerate classes, every consistent learner (no matter how it breaks ties) achieves the optimal realizable sample complexity, with the gap only within a constant factor.72% similarUnverifiedHigh-dimensional structure learning of Gaussian DAGs faces a statistical-computational gap: methods with sharp sample complexity rely on computationally expensive subset searches and require a pre-specified in-degree upper bound, while polynomial-time algorithms exhibit comparatively inferior sample complexity.72% similarUnverifiedε-prediction is prone to numerical instability at large embedding dimensions, because when α_bar_t approaches zero the scaling factor 1/sqrt(α_bar_t) tends to infinity, amplifying prediction errors.71% similarUnverifiedThe computational complexity of Bayesian optimization typically grows exponentially with parameter dimensionality, and it is traditionally only applicable to low-dimensional problems (generally within a few dozen dimensions).68% similarUnverifiedFor the empirical measure case, the iteration reduces to a finite-dimensional trust-region method under the L²(ρ_N) inner product, and when the initial objective gap is uniformly bounded, the complexity constant is independent of both the number of particles and the dimension.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1023005API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1023005MCP
get_claim(id=1023005)