Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
A simulation study published on arXiv evaluated the impact of sample splitting choices for TMLE and AIPW on the average treatment effect (ATE) for binary outcomes, with eight headline estimators sharing the same nuisance model library, number of inner folds and truncation bound.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen overlap is poor, the choice of truncation bound should be actively evaluated, and the results of both AIPW and TMLE should be reported rather than choosing only one.71% similarUnverifiedA study from arXiv proposed a test-time optimization method that improves the completeness and reliability of LLM explanations by removing concepts not mentioned in the input.69% similarUnverifiedA study published on arXiv (arXiv:2610.02267) conducted paired evaluations of System-1 decision models and performed a self-audit of its own evaluation process.69% similarUnverifiedAn arXiv study (arXiv:2609.20824v1) tested seven entropy-based confidence signal methods, covering 7 model pairings and 5 standard NLU benchmarks.66% similarUnverifiedExperimental results show that the two internal representation-based methods, LTD and ARP, consistently outperform calibration baseline methods based on surface generation and sequences.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1023527API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1023527MCP
get_claim(id=1023527)