Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Fitting the propensity score in-sample induces dependence among individual contributions, so variance estimators derived under the i.i.d. assumption underestimate the true uncertainty.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedMost general-purpose large models suffer from overconfidence issues, where their output probabilities reflect token distribution preferences more than genuine uncertainty estimates.78% similarUnverifiedClustered standard errors target the situation of non-independent samples and can handle correlation between samples, whereas treating each sample as an independent observation underestimates the variance.75% similarUnverifiedThe theoretical error rate of probabilistic data structures is built on the assumption of uniform hash distribution; if a hash function is biased toward a particular input distribution, the actual false positive rate will be significantly higher than the theoretical value.73% similarUnverifiedDiscrepancies among prior EF prediction studies largely stem from inconsistencies in target populations, as different studies adopt heterogeneous inclusion criteria and different definitions of extubation failure.73% similarUnverifiedIn recommendation scenarios, models typically use Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) to measure the error between predicted ratings and actual ratings.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1023533API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1023533MCP
get_claim(id=1023533)