Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
When re-delivering after manual correction on the error branch, if the failure point occurred after the CRM had already written, directly re-running the entire lead may create duplicate records, so idempotency design is needed (such as a unique identifier plus upsert or deduplication).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn RAG scenarios, Recall is usually prioritized over Precision, because missing a piece of key evidence often directly leads to an incorrect answer, whereas retrieving a few extra irrelevant documents only increases context noise and token cost.70% similarUnverifiedThe failover loop categorizes exceptions: transient errors trigger a cooldown before switching to the next key, exhaustion triggers a switch to the next key, rejection suspends that key, and only fatal errors are actually thrown.70% similarUnverifiedQuery rewriting in CRAG has the LLM decompose the original question into several more precise sub-queries, retrieve results separately, and then merge them, so as to reduce retrieval failures caused by the vocabulary gap.69% similarUnverifiedAfter correcting the word coordinates in the correction adapter, all five annotated repetition events were successfully recovered, indicating that baseline failures sometimes stem from annotation interface or data coordinate errors rather than the algorithm itself.68% similarUnverifiedAsynchronous replication mode may cause a small amount of data loss when the primary node suddenly goes down.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1024591API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1024591MCP
get_claim(id=1024591)