Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Kernel-level evidence comes from a layer outside and beneath the agent process, which the agent cannot directly tamper with, and is therefore more trustworthy than application-layer logs.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAgent评测框架处于无人认领、逐渐drift（漂移）的状态比没有框架更危险，因为它会给团队虚假的安全感73% similarUnverifiedReview in agent systems should focus not only on whether the final output is correct, but also on whether the process that produced that output is trustworthy.71% similarUnverifiedThe facts (ground-truth answer points) used for evaluation must never be provided to the Agent being tested, otherwise the Agent will take shortcuts and cheat.71% similarUnverifiedIn a multi-agent architecture, the main agent can only summarize based on information it has access to; if failure details from sub-agents are not passed back, the main agent's summary will have blind spots.70% similarUnverifiedPlacing human review at the end of an agent workflow is prone to failure because, by the final answer stage, the intermediate decision paths have been compressed or hidden, and reviewers cannot see the evidence the agent considered or discarded early on.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1027653API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1027653MCP
get_claim(id=1027653)