Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The paper emphasizes that learning, runtime permissions, and consequential operations require mutually independent safeguard mechanisms, and the module responsible for self-evolution should not simultaneously hold the permission to execute high-risk actions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe white paper argues that agent permissions should dynamically converge based on task context, rather than inheriting the user's full permissions in a one-time grant.70% similarUnverifiedFor high-risk actions (such as DELETE operations), relying solely on prompts to constrain agent behavior is insufficient; multi-layer defense mechanisms must be established at the framework level.69% similarUnverifiedThe author argues that security should not rely on the self-discipline of the operator—whether human or AI—but on the architecture itself leaving no opportunity to make a mistake.68% similarUnverifiedThe design of the independent safety layer does not rely on the agent model's own judgment, but instead acts as an external independent component to monitor and constrain agent behavior.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1028048API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1028048MCP
get_claim(id=1028048)