Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the SWE-bench Verified evaluation, LFM2.5-24B-A2B scored 51.00%, trailing Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's 66.20% and Claude Sonnet 5.5's 55.2%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/28/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the AutomationBench evaluation, LFM2.5-24B-A2B scored 27.69%, higher than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's 8.72%, Gemma-4-26B-A4B's 5.46% and Nemotron-3.5-Lightning's 2.61%.77% similarUnverifiedLFM2.5-24B-A2B scored 80.71% on ToolSandbox, 65.01% on BFCL v4, 96.75% on IFEval and 48.09% on LiveClaw.74% similarUnverifiedOn the Frontier Code benchmark, GPT-6 Luna scored 56.1%, Claude Sonnet 5.0 scored 56.2%, and Kimi K3 scored 58.2%.71% similarUnverifiedThe fine-tuned Qwen3.5-4B model improved accuracy on BU Bench V1 from 15% to 53%.70% similarUnverifiedIn the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1029991API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1029991MCP
get_claim(id=1029991)