Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The rejection memory mechanism lets the proposer receive the most recently rejected proposals and the reasons for their rejection, as well as the failure list from the previous step, so as to avoid repeatedly proposing switches that have already been rejected; the paper's loop apparently did not include this mechanism.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedModels labeled 'obliterated' are uncensored versions with refusal mechanisms removed; in testing they more easily miss certain requirements in prompts, and uncensored does not mean better.74% similarUnverified'Reject' should be retained as a first-class outcome in the rewriting pipeline; if the system treats rejection as an exception, it will gradually drift toward over-editing.69% similarUnverifiedThe probability of reviewers proactively raising their scores after a rebuttal is generally not high.68% similarUnverifiedContradictory prompt rules cause the model to fail to perform actions it should have taken, for example, four legitimate refunds that should have been processed were not issued.68% similarUnverifiedThe mismatch failure modes the author summarizes include: a planning model doing UI walkthrough yields confident bug theories with no path evidence; a UI walker doing multi-file refactor yields click narratives and opportunistic edits; a refactor model doing security review brings quiet privilege expansion under a neat PR; a review model doing greenfield planning criticizes a proposal that does not yet exist.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1038316API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1038316MCP
get_claim(id=1038316)