Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Of the 21 outputs, 14 were judged as "too technical," and 13 were flagged as lacking some capability.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/29/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedTianji personally tested 22 experts this season, of which 13 can only talk, and only a minority can actually get work done.69% similarUnverifiedThe criteria are divided into four families—foundational, premature disclosure, goal deviation, and information omission—with 19 failure modes in total, of which 18 were triggered in actual testing.69% similarUnverifiedThe statistical scope of the 21% efficiency improvement figure is not clearly specified and may be a composite score of code output volume, feature delivery speed, or engineers' subjective assessments.67% similarUnverifiedThe developer cautions that the sample size of 18 matchups is insufficient to rank the models reliably.66% similarUnverifiedA developer reviewed 27 prompts accumulated over one year, of which 22 failed the reproducibility test (i.e., others using the prompts could not obtain the same output as the author).64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1040536API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1040536MCP
get_claim(id=1040536)