Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Violating the double-blind policy (such as promoting a paper prominently on a preprint platform in advance or leaving identifiable information in the paper) is one of the common triggers for desk rejection.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/14/2027
Sources
Top AI Conferences Plagued by "Desk Rejects": ICLR Submission Chaos and the Peer Review Dilemma
redditr/MachineLearning10/16/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedFor the capability negotiation interface, the default policy for unknown fields is usually recommended to be "ignore but log" to support server-first upgrades; for fields involving security semantics, they should be strictly rejected rather than silently ignored.64% similarVerifiedDesk rejection refers to the practice of a paper being directly rejected by the editorial board or area chairs before entering the peer review process.64% similarUnverifiedCookie-cutter scripts are easily identified by customers, leading to being blacklisted or marked as spam.63% similarUnverifiedStrictCite flags missing DOIs and fabricated conference or journal venues62% similarUnverifiedCache-level communication sacrifices the readability and interpretability of text; humans cannot directly understand the content being transferred, which increases the difficulty of debugging and security auditing.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1042350API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1042350MCP
get_claim(id=1042350)