Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
During validation, node-semver's own tests found 25 inconsistent judgments in jpm, for example treating ^9007199254740991.0.0 as a valid range.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCaveman's fixed benchmark test results from 54 runs show a 33.2% reduction in input tokens, with all 18/18 correctness checks passing.67% similarUnverifiedcheckwash 0.6.0 achieved a precision of 0.67 and recall of 0.22 for its own block judgment on this corpus, while the raw count signal read independently yielded a precision of 0.80 and recall of 0.89.62% similarUnverifiedAcross a range of question sizes spanning 256x, the error judgment rate of a single run is almost unchanged: 0.531 at T=16 and 0.534 at T=4096.62% similarUnverifiedUsing a 4B model to rerank the candidate shortlist filtered by BM25 outperformed BM25 alone (+0.047, confidence interval [0.020, 0.073]), even though the 4B reranker itself did not pass qualification.61% similarUnverifiedAfter testing 30 layer combinations, the best pairing was SenseNova L32 mapped to MiniMax H3 L49, using a 4096→128→5120 projector that achieved a cosine similarity of 0.9042 on the validation set.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1047232API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1047232MCP
get_claim(id=1047232)