Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On four Theory-of-Mind benchmarks, the weak model's average score rose from 0.49 to 0.91.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn comparison with the Sysmex analyzer, the model reported Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.86 to 0.98.74% similarUnverifiedThe same scaffold raised the weak model's execution quality from 0.88 to 2.0 (across four scoring dimensions), yet pushed the strong model toward overcautious shutdown (all four dimensions dropped).72% similarUnverifiedExcluding the three flagship models, all models' story quality scores were clustered between 0.62 and 0.73, while director's note scores spanned a wide range from 0.40 to 0.94.71% similarUnverifiedA meta-analysis by Schmidt & Hunter (1998) found that general cognitive ability tests have a predictive validity of r=0.51, while work sample tests reach r=0.5470% similarUnverifiedThe head-to-head comparison in this study was statistically underpowered at a sample size of n=9669% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1050037API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1050037MCP
get_claim(id=1050037)