Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
A meta-analysis by Schmidt & Hunter (1998) found that general cognitive ability tests have a predictive validity of r=0.51, while work sample tests reach r=0.54
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/8/2026
First Seen
Sources
Merge：AI驱动的代码审查招聘评估平台深度解析
Related Claims
UnverifiedFrank Schmidt和John Hunter在1998年发表的元分析研究（涵盖85年的研究数据）发现工作样本测试的预测效度约为0.54，结构化面试约为0.51，非结构化面试约为0.38，学历证书约为0.1076% similarUnverifiedWork sample tests have been shown in industrial-organizational psychology to have the highest predictive validity, with a correlation coefficient of r=0.5470% similarUnverifiedA 2020 study from North Carolina State University found that the correlation coefficient between algorithm interview pass rates and whether candidates prepared by practicing problems was r=0.62, while the correlation coefficient with subsequent work code quality scores was only r=0.12.68% similarUnverifiedIn the demonstration, the Claude 4.7 highest-reasoning model was used for testing; the model responded normally and the quota consumption displayed in the lower-right corner remained at zero throughout.67% similarUnverifiedThe accuracy data in the test has an error margin of approximately ±8–10 percentage points at n=100 sample size (based on a 95% confidence-level binomial confidence interval).66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/712628API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/712628MCP
get_claim(id=712628)