Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The 21 spec blind spots fall into five categories: seed data insufficient to support checks (4), missing boundary numbers and rounding rules (3), contradictions between sections (4), requirements stated but undefined (4), and email hiding real-world details (6).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/15/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe authors set up a blind test: they locked six agents in the source tree, moved out the files containing prior analyses, and gave them identical prompts that did not hint at the goal; three agents surfaced the underlying mechanism, but the authors' keyword-search scoring misjudged this as none of the six having established the connection, and on actually rereading they found that two of the three had clearly established the connection.68% similarUnverifiedrules-doctor 0.3 introduces four checks: CONTRADICTORY_RULES, SCOPE_BOUNDARY_MISSING, VAGUE_DIRECTIVE, and ADR_MISSING.64% similarUnverifiedSearch terms not covered by the 192 query terms will be completely invisible in terms of coverage, representing the greatest limitation of this methodology.62% similarUnverifiedThe gate can catch missing fields, but it cannot catch that 'the five dimensions were the wrong five to begin with,' nor can it stop the knowledge base from running along a wrong map; erroneous content is saved as if true and still counts when measured with the kernel's own ruler, so quality cannot be scored by the kernel itself.62% similarUnverified作者归纳出四类高频确定性工具调用错误：可选字段传null值、数组格式错误、空对象包裹、参数值缺失61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1050566API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1050566MCP
get_claim(id=1050566)