Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Tencent's published comparison table shows Hy-Memory-30B-A3B scoring an average of 55.49 across six benchmarks, slightly above Claude Opus 5's 54.62, a gap of 0.87 points; but looking at individual items, 0.02 points under the Hy-Memory framework and 0.01 points under MemOS are essentially noise level.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/31/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCompared with Qwen3-30B-A3B, Hy-Memory-30B-A3B improves by an average of 11 points, and still scores 56.89 on the EverMemOS framework, which it never saw in training.73% similarUnverified在覆盖九大维度共403道题的测试中，Muse-Glimmer-30B综合均分为76.04，比Corpus 3.6 27B的75.57高出0.47分67% similarUnverifiedOn the SWE-bench Verified evaluation, LFM2.5-24B-A2B scored 51.00%, trailing Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's 66.20% and Claude Sonnet 5.5's 55.2%.66% similarUnverifiedOn pure reasoning tasks, Qwen3 27B scores only 30.8 on HLE, notably behind Opus's score of 40.0.64% similarUnverifiedVocabulary choice matters more than backbone size: 10M labels with an 8k vocabulary (8.0M total parameters, bpb 1.168) beats 50M labels with a 2k vocabulary (33.5M total parameters, bpb 1.436) — 4.2 times fewer parameters but 18.7% lower bpb.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1054164API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1054164MCP
get_claim(id=1054164)