Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Qwen2.5 0.5B, across 96 replies, succeeded in direct parsing 0 times, succeeded via the parsing ladder 4 times, and conformed to the schema 0 times; most greedy replies echoed the user message and then entered a loop.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/15/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAfter enabling reasoning mode, Qwen3.8-27B's bug detection rate dropped to 6/20, and 12 of 40 answers could not be parsed as JSON because they exhausted the 12,000-token output limit; Ornith 1.5's detection rate remained 8/20, with 13/40 answers unparseable, but it took about half the time of Qwen.74% similarUnverifiedIn a synthetic logistic regression classifier experiment, after 80 steps of gradient-ascent-based repair, the unlearning loss rose from 0.0545 to 0.1649, yet the trigger attack success rate remained 100%.69% similarUnverifiedIn the 5-agent conversational cluster architecture (unstructured Markdown handoffs), the spec drift failure rate is 48.4%, the silent tool error propagation rate is 79.0%, the premature termination rate is 34.2%, and the end-to-end success rate is 18.5%.68% similarUnverifiedA Reddit user randomly sampled 50 questions from the MATH-500 dataset and ran experiments across multiple quantized versions of Qwen3.5-4B.66% similarUnverifiedOn a test set of 600 synthetic invoices, the QLoRA fine-tuned model achieved a full-invoice exact rate of 83.0%, an auto-approval rate of 86.8%, and 0 out of 461 validation-coverage field errors in approved invoices (upper bound 0.8%).65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1056274API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1056274MCP
get_claim(id=1056274)