Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The author tested only one model, qwen2.5:7b, and explicitly stated that no conclusion can be drawn about the performance of other models.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/16/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAmong the three tested models, only Qwen2.5-3B can reliably refuse to answer when the evidence does not support an answer.77% similarUnverifiedThis test is a single-source personal test; the model designation is labeled as Qwen 3.8 27B with naming ambiguity, and details such as the actual configuration, quantization method, and generation time have not been disclosed, leaving reproducibility to be verified.74% similarUnverifiedThe author noted that other models previously tested, such as 35B and 3B variants, actually performed worse than the Q2 version of Qwen3 27B on the Kanban task.67% similarUnverifiedA user with a private benchmark stated that Qwen 3.8 was only the second local model able to correctly reason through their test questions, but it took 12 minutes and 30 seconds and used five times as many tokens as Gemma 4.65% similarUnverifiedBilibili developer Luke conducted a cross-evaluation test of the Qwen3 series 27B model released by Unsloth across multiple quantization levels from Q1 to Q8.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1058369API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1058369MCP
get_claim(id=1058369)