Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
According to official self-reported data, compared with V4.1-Flash, V4.1-Flash-1017 improved on Terminal-Bench 4.0 from 31.2 to 42.3 (+11.1), on HLE from 36.8 to 42.6 (+5.8), on DeepSWE v1.1 from 74.2 to 77.0 (+2.8), and on Automation-Bench from 54.8 to 60.5 (+5.7).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/1/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDeepSeek's model V4 Flash 0731 achieved a score of 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.1.75% similarUnverifiedOn Terminal Bench v2.1, Beam's 80.1 trails DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's 90.6; on DeepSWE v1.1, Beam's 44.4 trails GLM-5.3's 61.0 and Kimi K3's 68.0.71% similarUnverifiedJudging from the version number 1017, V4.1-Flash-1017 looks more like an intermediate version in a rapid iteration cycle, with possible further adjustments to come.64% similarUnverifiedV4.1-Flash-1017 scores 77.0 on the DeepSWE benchmark.64% similarUnverifiedThe release party claimed that DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash outperforms Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol on three benchmarks: DeepSWE, CyberGym, and Automation Bench.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1059984API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1059984MCP
get_claim(id=1059984)