Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Accounts are non-transferable in the regulatory sense because transfer causes the verified subject and the subject actually controlling the funds to diverge, making it impossible for the platform to fulfill its obligation to monitor suspicious transactions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe 'after-sale guarantee' promises of third-party top-up platforms lack binding force, and top-up providers typically bear no responsibility when accounts are banned for violating terms of service.74% similarUnverifiedBulk purchasing official accounts for pooled shared scheduling clearly violates the prohibitive clauses regarding account sharing and resale in Cursor's official terms of service.69% similarUnverifiedSensitive operations such as refunds, payments, and account changes still require explicit rules, permission settings, and human approval when necessary, and should not be decided independently by AI.66% similarUnverifiedNo third party can truly provide 'permanently valid' official Cursor permissions, because Cursor's subscription system, model invocation rules, and risk-control policies are continuously adjusted.65% similarUnverifiedinfosec.exchange's rule is: accounts operated by LLMs and AI are not allowed.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1063573API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1063573MCP
get_claim(id=1063573)