Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The 'after-sale guarantee' promises of third-party top-up platforms lack binding force, and top-up providers typically bear no responsibility when accounts are banned for violating terms of service.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/28/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThird-party top-up services violate OpenAI's terms of service prohibiting account sharing, account transfers, and regional price arbitrage, and accounts may be subject to mass bans.72% similarUnverifiedThe guarantee promises made by third-party top-up platforms are virtually unenforceable legally, and seeking recourse after a platform disappears is extremely difficult.70% similarUnverifiedAny third-party Cursor service may violate the official terms of service, posing a theoretical risk of account suspension.67% similarUnverifiedThe absence of a clear authorization node blurs accountability boundaries, making it difficult to assign responsibility when data breaches or compliance violations occur.67% similarUnverifiedNo third party can truly provide 'permanently valid' official Cursor permissions, because Cursor's subscription system, model invocation rules, and risk-control policies are continuously adjusted.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/958619API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/958619MCP
get_claim(id=958619)