Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The results on the above 76 synthetic cases belong to the development set, and the cases, prompts and checkers were built together; these numbers predate the addition of the past-history step, which has not yet been measured.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/16/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified报告测出DiffusionGemma平均每步生成token数达到19.74个，而自回归方法每步只能生成1个66% similarUnverified该测试样本规模相对有限（5个模型、13个代码库），结论有待更大规模验证65% similarUnverifiedOn an open set of 76 synthetic emergency cases, adding Gemma's reading of the course notes raised agreement with expected results from 72% with rules alone to 97%, reduced missed judgments from 21 of 42 cases to 1, produced 0 false positives among 34 cases that should have stayed quiet, with a median model-step latency of 1.87 seconds.65% similarUnverifiedAdding 1,200 synthetic forgery samples did not bring any improvement to model performance.64% similarUnverifiedThe criteria are divided into four families—foundational, premature disclosure, goal deviation, and information omission—with 19 failure modes in total, of which 18 were triggered in actual testing.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1064185API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1064185MCP
get_claim(id=1064185)