Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Threshold selection should reflect the task, the available resources, and the relative costs of the two types of errors: when the cost of a miss is extremely high, one tends to lower the threshold to raise recall, and when human review capacity is limited, precision and PR behavior become critical; the AUC value itself will not choose the threshold for you.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSetting Maximum Iteration too high may waste cost (tokens), while setting it too low may truncate the task before completion; it is a key parameter that requires trade-offs in Agent tuning.77% similarUnverifiedSetting the confidence threshold is a risk-reward tradeoff: a threshold that is too high causes simple tickets to be routed back to humans, limiting efficiency gains, while a threshold that is too low causes error rates to climb on ambiguous cases; it is recommended to collect data via shadow mode and use ROC curve analysis to determine the threshold.75% similarUnverifiedThe key difficulty of data volume threshold control lies in threshold setting: too low causes frequent false positives, while too high may miss slow, sustained low-rate exfiltration.74% similarUnverifiedComplete shift invariance is not always the optimal choice; classification tasks favor invariance while object detection tasks need to preserve positional information.74% similarUnverifiedThe acceptance criteria of ADR 001 require: 95% of requests complete within the latency SLA of their assigned tier; the average daily compute cost is reduced by ≥ 30% compared with the single-model baseline; and policy violation incidents do not increase after introducing the escalation mechanism.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1067057API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1067057MCP
get_claim(id=1067057)