Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The model API itself is stateless, so content that needs to be remembered must be placed back into the prompt with every request; the longer the context, the higher the token consumption and latency, and it may hit the context window limit.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLarge models themselves are stateless; the model does not retain historical information between API calls and can only see the context provided in the current request.76% similarUnverifiedLLM API requests have a strict limit on the amount of data per call, and untruncated error logs may exceed this limit, rendering the conversation unusable75% similarUnverifiedThe large model itself is stateless and can only see what is in the current prompt, with no access to prior session memory; the framework must be responsible for persisting all key information.74% similarUnverifiedThe approach of having the model assemble requests on its own solely based on API documentation has limitations: it may hallucinate parameters, overlook authentication, handle errors improperly, and requires stuffing complete documentation into the context, causing context bloat, increasing costs, and reducing accuracy.74% similarUnverifiedSwitching models causes context cache invalidation, requiring the re-injection of state such as codebase structure, task objectives, and completed steps via prompts, consuming additional tokens and potentially introducing errors.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1071750API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1071750MCP
get_claim(id=1071750)