Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the mathematics community, the typical verification path for major results is: the authors upload the paper to a preprint platform such as arXiv, the community conducts informal review over weeks to months, and the paper is then submitted to a journal for formal peer review.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedResearchers should make good use of arXiv preprints by publishing their papers in advance to showcase their research in application materials.73% similarUnverifiedThe Clay Mathematics Institute's prize award process requires that a candidate solution first be published in a peer-reviewed journal, followed by a waiting period of at least two years for verification by an expert committee.71% similarUnverifiedAn arXiv paper is not equivalent to a published paper; a paper is considered formally published only after passing peer review and being included in a journal or conference proceedings.71% similarUnverifiedGenuine mathematical results should be published on arXiv or in authoritative journals and subjected to scrutiny by mathematicians worldwide.70% similarUnverifiedWhen reviewers assess novelty, they look at the incremental contribution of the submission relative to all existing literature, and prior arXiv work also counts as existing literature.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1075343API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1075343MCP
get_claim(id=1075343)