Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
When reviewers assess novelty, they look at the incremental contribution of the submission relative to all existing literature, and prior arXiv work also counts as existing literature.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAn arXiv paper is not equivalent to a published paper; a paper is considered formally published only after passing peer review and being included in a journal or conference proceedings.71% similarUnverifiedICLR uses a double-blind review process but takes a relatively permissive stance toward arXiv preprints, allowing authors to post papers on arXiv before submission.69% similarUnverifiedResearchers should make good use of arXiv preprints by publishing their papers in advance to showcase their research in application materials.68% similarUnverifiedThe arXiv cs.CL category requires first-time submitters to obtain an endorsement from an existing author.64% similarUnverifiedThe results of the paper's experiments were scored and evaluated by the original paper's authors themselves.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/940373API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/940373MCP
get_claim(id=940373)