Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In one demonstration case, the C code reconstructed by REEA passed all 3205 tests targeting the original game.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/18/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the fixture example, the mutant-state run shows 4 passed, indicating that the new tests in the patch also pass on the unfixed code, so the tests do not observe the fix.66% similarUnverifiedIn a C++ wireless skateboarding game test, Muse Glimmer's attempt to fix a compilation error caused the entire system to crash completely64% similarUnverified该基准被命名为CFC（Conditional Closure），历史序列涵盖V1至V100，最终发布的可复现测试集包含95个变体、共计285次重复运行63% similarUnverifiedThe AIClaw v3.7.7 release notes record 259 renderer/helper tests and 86 work panel UI checks passing, which is the total for the entire local check set rather than just preview-related counts; the release CI also succeeded.63% similarUnverifiedFor truly one-off experimental code, the return on investment in testing is very low; but once the code is reused or enters a shared branch, its classification should be reassessed.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1075988API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1075988MCP
get_claim(id=1075988)