Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The false positive rate determines whether the loop can function: if the proportion of real failures among the low-scoring outputs flagged by the Judge is too low, the burden of human review will overwhelm the process.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen a reviewer's self-reported areas are too broad, too obscure, or severely misaligned with that year's submission distribution, the matching score may fall below the system threshold, causing that reviewer to enter a pending pool and remain unassigned for a long time.78% similarUnverifiedWhen the cost of a false negative is much higher than the cost of a false positive, the optimal threshold should be lowered so that the system is more inclined to block suspicious transactions.77% similarUnverifiedA drop in recall (evaluation passes but human judges fail) indicates blind spots—these failures are invisible in metrics until support tickets surge.76% similarUnverifiedThe author introduced a logical rule to fix the false positive: if the loss is improving, then a gradient norm of 0 is a reporting-layer artifact, at which point the check should actively stand down and log the reason for standing down as a visible skip.76% similarUnverified撤稿意味着放弃已有的评审结果和潜在的Findings机会，需在履历含金量与录用概率之间权衡75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1077153API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1077153MCP
get_claim(id=1077153)