Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The uploader's conclusion is that Gemini 4 wins on this problem, but emphasizes that testing only one problem cannot decide the winner and that results may differ with a different problem; DeepSeek called the official API directly and did not specially configure the environment, which differs from Gemini's environment, so speeds are not compared.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/21/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/4/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGemini 4 could precisely fix the takeoff position after receiving vague feedback, indicating a better grasp of spatial relationships; DeepSeek's rewrite involved a lot of work but did not grasp the core problem.78% similarUnverifiedOn the third-party platform Artificial Analysis, Gemini 4 ranks low in speed and did not make the speed leaderboard.74% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 was closer to a runnable state on its first generation, whereas DeepSeek V4 Pro's code, though longer, made elementary mistakes in basic logic.73% similarUnverifiedIn the lottery tool development test, Gemini 4 Argon implemented functions such as deduplicating the list, restricting previous winners from winning again, and retaining data after refresh, and the interaction logic was clear; the UP host believed Gemini won this round.72% similarUnverifiedAntigravity (Gemini 3.1 Pro) was the only client in this experiment whose accuracy declined, dropping to 89%, because it skipped reading the schema of the multi-operation tool and guessed the operation name.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1078622API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1078622MCP
get_claim(id=1078622)