Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Gemini 4 could precisely fix the takeoff position after receiving vague feedback, indicating a better grasp of spatial relationships; DeepSeek's rewrite involved a lot of work but did not grasp the core problem.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/21/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/4/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe uploader's conclusion is that Gemini 4 wins on this problem, but emphasizes that testing only one problem cannot decide the winner and that results may differ with a different problem; DeepSeek called the official API directly and did not specially configure the environment, which differs from Gemini's environment, so speeds are not compared.78% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 was closer to a runnable state on its first generation, whereas DeepSeek V4 Pro's code, though longer, made elementary mistakes in basic logic.77% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 can reason through video understanding, precisely locate the cause of failure, and translate corrective solutions into specific bodily instructions such as stance width, arm-swing trajectory, and release timing.74% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 is stunning in 3D scene generation, but it remains a weak point in real physics simulation; if a project depends on precise physical feedback, it is not recommended for direct production use at this stage.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1078627API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1078627MCP
get_claim(id=1078627)