Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
mitmproxy's regular workflow relies on a self-signed CA, requiring manual installation of the root certificate into the target device or browser trust store.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe Baseline Requirements established by the CA/Browser Forum impose mandatory specifications on the methods, frequency, and logging of domain validation, and browsers and operating systems decide whether to trust a given CA based on these specifications.71% similarUnverifiedAdding a dedicated option for a specific CA rather than a generic interface suggests that mitmproxy is taking a compliance-adaptation route.63% similarUnverified个人自用工具可以通过在终端执行xattr -cr命令绕过Gatekeeper限制，或使用自签名证书完成本地部署62% similarUnverifiedMigrating trust anchors involves multi-party coordination across root CAs, intermediate CAs, OS trust stores, browser trust stores and industry-specific trust systems, requiring cross-organizational negotiation and multi-year planning.61% similarUnverifiedMeans of reducing trust risk in managed platforms include minimizing the scope of authorization (granting access only to specific repositories rather than all repositories), regularly rotating credentials, and paying attention to the platform's security certifications (such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001).60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1084449API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1084449MCP
get_claim(id=1084449)