Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Goodfire reported that in an image network, discarding the smallest three-quarters of readings only dropped accuracy from 72% to 71%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/20/2027
Sources
One Neuron Detects Both Cats and Cars? We Reproduced It and Found a New Explanation
youtubeUp the Tech Tree10/16/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the control group where the answer key was removed from the prompt, the match rate plummeted from 63% to 1% (1/75).69% similarUnverifiedWhen the agent reads the PHREEQC simulator report via a section index rather than context, GPT-5.1's accuracy drops by 11.3 percentage points.67% similarUnverifiedA detection rate of 73.43% means that approximately one in four core errors still goes uncaught, indicating that automated review cannot yet fully replace the judgment of human experts.66% similarUnverifiedAt the 0.81 threshold, the proportion of cached answers that "fit the question" is 5.8 to 10.7 percentage points lower than fresh answers; converted to all responses, the overall quality loss is about 2 to 3 percentage points; Haiku 5.5 has the largest gap (10.7 percentage points), with a cached-answer pass rate of only 67.9%.66% similarUnverifiedAfter introducing an explicit resolver to handle information supersession relationships, stale-memory failures dropped to zero and overall accuracy jumped from 33% to 78%.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1085068API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1085068MCP
get_claim(id=1085068)