Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the LiveClaw evaluation, LFM2.5-24B scored 48.09, compared with 38.19 for the Qwen model.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/5/2026
Sources
Liquid AI LFM2.5-24B Tested on Mac mini M6: 70 TPS and 128K Context
bilibili安得广厦千万间67810/18/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLFM2.5-24B-A2B scored 48.09 on the LiveClaw benchmark.79% similarUnverifiedGlimmer's intelligence index score of 35 surpasses Gemma 2 27B (30) and nearly matches Qwen 2.5 (36), with Qwen 2.5 72B topping the leaderboard at 38.72% similarUnverifiedUsing Qwen3-14B to generate risk exam papers yielded only 5/25 passages with clear signals, and only after switching to stricter prompts and Qwen3-32B were 21 passages obtained.71% similarUnverifiedThe user ultimately settled on a 27B uncensored model, having previously iterated through 27B and 35B MoE models in the Qwen series.69% similarUnverifiedLFM2.5-24B-A2B surpassed Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on five of eight tool-use benchmarks.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1085750API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1085750MCP
get_claim(id=1085750)