Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
In open-source practice, plugin source code can usually be released under permissive licenses such as MIT or Apache-2.0, but the rights to image assets such as character illustrations and logos remain with the original rights holders or fan artists, and the code license does not automatically cover these resources.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Building a Theresa-Themed Plugin for DeepSeek Harness by Hand, Open-Sourcing Planned
bilibili云离花10/22/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified开源许可证（如 MIT、Apache 2.0）授权代码使用权，并在法律层面赋予社区进行内容创作和传播的自由80% similarVerifiedThe Apache 2.0 license, unlike the GPL family, allows users to integrate code into closed-source commercial products and includes explicit patent grant clauses, whereas the MIT license does not include an explicit grant of patent rights.73% similarUnverifiedQianwen Developers clarified that Image 2.1's research license governs model weights, code, and documentation, and that commercial use requires a separate license.73% similarUnverifiedsource-available意味着源代码公开可审查，但可能在商业使用、再分发或修改方面附加限制条款，与OSI认证的开源许可证不同71% similarUnverifiedAOCI-Code uses a source-available license rather than a standard MIT license, and the rights to use, modify, and distribute are subject to additional restrictions.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1088611API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1088611MCP
get_claim(id=1088611)