Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Flint approaches the performance of Qwen 3.8 27B while being 3-6 times faster, and is the best performer among comparable sub-50B MoE models on benchmarks such as SWE Bench Pro, VR Verified, and Terminal Bench 2.1.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/8/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn agentic coding benchmarks such as SWE Bench Pro, Qwen 3.8 reportedly surpasses Opus 4.6 Max on some tasks.70% similarUnverifiedFlint scores 89.7 on SWE-bench Pro v2, while Qwen 3.6 scores 73.8.70% similarVerifiedQwen3.8-Flash-Next achieved scores of 58.7 and 62.5 on the SWE-bench 1.1 and SWE-bench Pro evaluations, respectively.66% similarUnverifiedOn SWE Bench Pro, Glimmer narrowly beat Qwen with 51.2 vs. 50.2, but Qwen surpassed it on SWE Bench Verified (Qwen 77.2 vs. 76) and Terminal Bench (Qwen 60.7 vs. 51.7).65% similarUnverifiedThe fine-tuned Qwen3.5-4B model improved accuracy on BU Bench V1 from 15% to 53%.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1094886API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1094886MCP
get_claim(id=1094886)