Verified65% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next achieved scores of 58.7 and 62.5 on the SWE-bench 1.1 and SWE-bench Pro evaluations, respectively.
3
Sources
65%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/5/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/4/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDory scores 61.8 on SWE-bench Verified (4 loops, NVIDIA's own testing), while Qwen3.5-9B scores 61.75% similarUnverifiedOn SWE Bench Pro, Glimmer narrowly beat Qwen with 51.2 vs. 50.2, but Qwen surpassed it on SWE Bench Verified (Qwen 77.2 vs. 76) and Terminal Bench (Qwen 60.7 vs. 51.7).73% similarUnverifiedAlibaba's official figures show Qwen3.8 Flash scoring 62.5 on SWE-Bench Pro, leading Claude Opus 4.6 by approximately 9 points; 73.9 on Cowork Bench versus DeepSeek's 45.1; and 55.7 on Job Bench, exceeding Opus 4.6 by approximately 20 points.72% similarUnverifiedIn the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/862167API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/862167MCP
get_claim(id=862167)