Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the tool-calling loop, the model is only responsible for decision-making and expression (deciding what to call and what parameters to pass), while actual execution is done by deterministic code, which both avoids the security risk of the model directly operating external systems and makes the calling process auditable and retryable.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedEngineering practices based on the assumption that a model has been compromised include: independently validating model outputs, applying the principle of least privilege to restrict the data and tools accessible to the model, continuously monitoring and auditing inputs and outputs, and isolating scenarios that involve ingesting external content.80% similarUnverifiedA security boundary should be added between the model's intent and local execution, where the model is only responsible for proposing what it wants to do, and whether it can be executed is determined by hard-coded local code.79% similarUnverifiedThis design separates deterministic safety constraints from probabilistic model reasoning: the model is responsible for understanding the materials, extracting features, and generating an assessment opinion, while the final veto power rests in code logic that cannot be altered by prompts.78% similarUnverifiedThe governed approach paradigm assigns language models only the responsibility of understanding questions, while a deterministic policy engine selects and runs pre-approved analytics procedures.78% similarUnverifiedA runtime safety layer can intercept high-risk behaviors before model inference results are translated into actual operations.77% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1096092API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1096092MCP
get_claim(id=1096092)