Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On a held-out combined set of 1,103 real photos, Pasma-Small achieved 89.12% Top-1 accuracy for clothing type, versus 80.24% for SigLIP-Base zero-shot.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/23/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe mean accuracy difference of occupational profiles relative to the minimal baseline was -0.6 percentage points, with a 95% bootstrap interval of [-1.5, +0.2].63% similarUnverifiedOverall accuracy remained almost unchanged: agreement with humans was 54.4% without images, 53.7% with aligned images, and 54.7% with misleading images.63% similarUnverifiedThe 98% score from a single classification is the confidence level for that message's corresponding category, and does not represent an overall model accuracy of 98%.62% similarUnverifiedIn practice FewHumans saves only about 9% of human labels (interval estimate 0.91 [0.87, 0.95]), not the 10x claimed.62% similarUnverifiedIn the director of photography task, every model scored between 0.91 and 0.96, and cinematography vocabulary is considered a solved problem.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1096448API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1096448MCP
get_claim(id=1096448)