Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The mean accuracy difference of occupational profiles relative to the minimal baseline was -0.6 percentage points, with a 95% bootstrap interval of [-1.5, +0.2].
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn scenarios where AI-generated works account for a low proportion (e.g., only 5%), even with a detection accuracy of 90%, more than two-thirds of the flagged works are actually human-created—this is the base rate fallacy in Bayesian reasoning.69% similarUnverifiedOn the SuperGPQA benchmark, the minimal baseline answered only 54.0% of questions correctly on the first attempt, while occupational profiles reached 71.6%, but this advantage stems from prompt length or format rather than domain expertise.69% similarUnverified推荐为每个人注册5-10张不同条件下的照片，使用多模板平均向量可将识别准确率提升2-5个百分点69% similarUnverifiedOn the BioMysteryBench bioinformatics task, the average problem-solving rate with occupational profiles was 46.7%, while the minimal baseline reached 56.7%, a gap of -10.0 percentage points (95% interval [-16.7, -3.3]).69% similarUnverifiedMultiple meta-analyses show that even trained personnel achieve an accuracy rate of only slightly above chance (approximately 54%–60%) when judging deception based on microexpressions.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/966775API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/966775MCP
get_claim(id=966775)