Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the NumPy CNN visualization task, Opus 5.5 took about 1 minute at a cost of about $2.30; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost $0.32 and took nearly 1 hour; Kimi K3.1 Pro was close to Opus in speed and close to DeepSeek in cost.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/8/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Partially VerifiedIn the "pelican riding a bicycle" SVG prompt test, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's output cost 23 cents, while Opus 5.5 cost $6, making the former about 26 times cheaper, but DeepSeek took 1 hour while Opus took only 20 minutes.78% similarUnverifiedIf the same session stops after the 21st call (the prompt has not crossed 100K), Haiku 5.5 costs $0.040, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.077 at peak and $0.039 off-peak.72% similarUnverifiedUnder the same prompt, DeepSeek cost about 0.23 USD to generate a 3D scene, while Claude Opus 5.5 required 6 USD; DeepSeek is about 26 times cheaper but takes longer (1 hour vs 20 minutes).72% similarPartially VerifiedIn a Minecraft sandbox game generation comparison, Kimi K3 took 2.5 hours and cost $35, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 took 1.5 hours and cost 80 cents, nearly 44 times cheaper.70% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash L017 reaches a 77% pass rate on the DDSWE coding benchmark, at an average cost of only 1.3 yuan per task.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1097637API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1097637MCP
get_claim(id=1097637)