Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Traditional app locks usually adopt a restrictive strategy (such as forcing an exit at a set time), which easily triggers user resistance.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/26/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen a system overrides a preference again after the user has explicitly and manually selected it, this constitutes an intent violation in interaction design, sliding from nudging into coercion.72% similarUnverifiedCommon implementations of guardrail mechanisms include declaring prohibited operations in system prompts, setting whitelists at the tool-call layer, and introducing human-in-the-loop nodes that require high-risk operations to pause and obtain user authorization71% similarUnverifiedPrompting nudges should be removed because modern models already have the corresponding behaviors by default and repeating them wastes computing power and disrupts judgment; hard constraints (such as 'never click the publish button twice') should be retained to prevent irreversible mistakes.69% similarUnverifiedActuator safety interlocking is a common design in automation control: an action is permitted to execute if and only if multiple conditions are satisfied simultaneously, and if any condition is not satisfied it remains shut off.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1099490API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1099490MCP
get_claim(id=1099490)