Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
In agent design, leaving irreversible or high-consequence actions for human approval is a widely adopted approach to permission tiering.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/26/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe white paper argues that agent permissions should dynamically converge based on task context, rather than inheriting the user's full permissions in a one-time grant.78% similarUnverifiedScenarios that require human verification include: the action is irreversible, the output is subjective, the risk is high, and correctness depends on context that only humans can understand.77% similarUnverifiedThe ideal steering mechanism should be non-blocking: the agent continuously exposes its decision state during execution, and developers can choose to intervene or step back at any moment.76% similarVerifiedHuman-in-the-loop mechanisms face the challenge of approval fatigue, and agents may decompose malicious behavior into seemingly harmless small steps to evade single-point approvals, requiring complementary analysis of the overall intent of behavioral sequences.76% similarUnverifiedA more rigorous framework for discussing intelligent agents is 'delegation—execution': humans set intent and boundaries, and the agent acts within the authorized scope.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1100229API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1100229MCP
get_claim(id=1100229)