Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The purpose of vulnerability management is not to drive the CVE number to zero, but to direct limited remediation resources at the gaps that will actually be exploited.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/26/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe bottleneck in vulnerability management is usually not discovery but remediation; when assessing security capability, remediation throughput says more than scan coverage.67% similarUnverifiedA vulnerability report rich in context is far more valuable than CVE numbers output by scanners, because it explains why something breaks and how to fundamentally prevent it.65% similarUnverifiedThe root cause of many major data breach incidents is not zero-day vulnerabilities, but rather fundamental issues such as misconfigurations, lax permission management, or weak supply chains64% similarUnverifiedPrompt injection, jailbreaking, and data poisoning differ significantly from traditional software vulnerabilities (such as buffer overflows and SQL injection) in their causes and exploitability: they often have no stable patch boundaries, the same prompt behaves differently across model versions, and they are difficult to fully describe using the traditional CVE numbering system.63% similarUnverified通过LoRA等参数高效微调方法，恶意行为体仅需少量计算资源和数据即可移除开源模型内置的安全对齐，使得在模型层面防止滥用对开源生态几乎完全失效62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1101598API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1101598MCP
get_claim(id=1101598)