Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Publishing only successful cases without disclosing negative results would aggravate publication bias and undermine academic trust.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the biotech field, success stories are widely disseminated, while failed projects are silenced due to commercial confidentiality, reputational concerns, or research publication preferences—a phenomenon academically known as 'publication bias' and 'survivorship bias.'76% similarUnverifiedThe analytical article predicts that if this narrative is not effectively countered, it will lead to failures such as policy being driven by fear, both sides of the regulatory debate becoming entrenched, erosion of public trust, and compression of viewpoint diversity.76% similarUnverifiedThe practice of reducing similarity scores by rewriting text to evade plagiarism detection systems is essentially a circumvention of academic integrity mechanisms rather than an improvement of content.69% similarUnverifiedIn scientific and policy discussions, the epistemic weight assigned to internal dissenters is typically higher than that assigned to external critics, a phenomenon known as the source credibility effect.69% similarUnverifiedWhen a review combines a low score with high confidence and the criticism is unjustified, it amplifies the gap between the review opinion and the actual evidence, making it easier for the AC to identify it as a review quality issue.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1101783API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1101783MCP
get_claim(id=1101783)