Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Current public information about Ψ-0.6 consists mainly of evaluations self-reported by the authors, and third-party reproduction and broader benchmark comparisons remain to be added.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOver the past two weeks, five readers sent corrections to the author, all about the validator rather than the validated object; this was the sixth issue of the same kind but no one sent it, and the author found it by re-running the measurement before publishing an article that depends on it.64% similarUnverifiedWhen reviewers assess novelty, they look at the incremental contribution of the submission relative to all existing literature, and prior arXiv work also counts as existing literature.63% similarUnverifiedThe scoring rubric used by the author has been published at https://skill123.me/methodology, including the weights and the meaning of each dimension.63% similarUnverifiedThe author publicly poses five questions on which feedback is sought, including whether the problem formulation is useful, whether distinguishing GMR from ordinary replay is scientifically meaningful, whether STRATA reveals failure modes better than existing evaluations, whether the experimental comparison is fair, and which relevant literature has been missed.61% similarUnverifiedThe author recommends placing a freshness file alongside publicly released headline numbers, recording the version under which the number was measured and allowing it to publicly contradict itself61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1104626API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1104626MCP
get_claim(id=1104626)